← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Manley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 26 0 8 8 0.308 0.0347 0.0347 0.1047 0.1047
2021-22 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 43 6 32 38 0.884 0.0997 0.0986 0.3006 0.2972
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 25 0 6 6 0.240
2024-25 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 25 0 6 6 0.240
2023-24 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 25 1 8 9 0.360
2023-24 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 25 1 8 9 0.360
2022-23 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 18 1 2 3 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · SUNY Morrisville
+79.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
30%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5896
Defenseman overall
#1487
Defenseman born in 2002
#1941
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2003-04
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2014-15
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.