IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Stendahl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-07-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 52 11 14 25 0.481 0.1766 0.1735 0.5075 0.4986
2004-05 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 46 5 8 13 0.283 0.1038 0.0968 0.2983 0.2782
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 27 8 13 21 0.778
2007-08 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 26 5 7 12 0.462
2006-07 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 26 4 10 14 0.538
2005-06 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 26 6 10 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2005-06 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+464.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37421
Forward overall
#1085
Forward born in 1984
#3862
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Johansson
Endicott · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Faiz Khan
UMass Boston · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jerad Tafoya
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.