← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reid Shafer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 26 2 0 2 0.077 0.0148 0.0148 0.0350 0.0350
2019-20 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 27 3 5 8 0.296 0.0569 0.0569 0.1350 0.1350
2020-21 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 37 0 6 6 0.162 0.0375 0.0375 0.1307 0.1307
2021-22 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 48 4 7 11 0.229 0.0530 0.0490 0.1847 0.1707
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 25 0 2 2 0.080
2024-25 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 25 3 1 4 0.160
2023-24 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 25 0 6 6 0.240
2022-23 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 23 1 2 3 0.130
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2022-23 · Connecticut College
+165.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16168
Defenseman overall
#2651
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2013-14
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.