← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Beaudry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-10-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Timmins Rock NOJHL 50 4 6 10 0.200 0.0334 0.0334 0.0833 0.0833
2020-21 Timmins Rock NOJHL 22 4 9 13 0.591 0.0987 0.0987 0.2460 0.2460
2021-22 Kemptville 73's CCHL 41 4 17 21 0.512 0.1111 0.1047 0.3963 0.3733
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 12 0 2 2 0.167
2024-25 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 23 1 17 18 0.783
2023-24 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 23 3 5 8 0.348
2022-23 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 21 1 2 3 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · SUNY Cortland
+44.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12988
Defenseman overall
#2268
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2015-16
0.710 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2024-25
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2001-02
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.