IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dusty Bergstrom Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Pine City Area USHS-MN 28 20 30 50 1.786 0.2200 0.2200 0.4337 0.4337
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 35 0 4 4 0.114 0.0264 0.0264 0.0924 0.0924
2021-22 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 48 4 9 13 0.271 0.0626 0.0616 0.2190 0.2155
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 26 1 9 10 0.385
2024-25 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 17 2 3 5 0.294
2023-24 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 20 3 5 8 0.400
2022-23 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 19 0 3 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Superior
+33.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6758
Defenseman overall
#1651
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Zappia
Utica · 2008-09
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Menzies
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Turer
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.