IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Cocuzzo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-05-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 34 4 7 11 0.324 0.0748 0.0748 0.2616 0.2616
2021-22 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0385 0.0382 0.1348 0.1336
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 7 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 14 1 2 3 0.214
2022-23 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 4 0 2 2 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2022-23 · Salve Regina
+1285.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7938
Defenseman overall
#1836
Defenseman born in 2002
#1062
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Haak
SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesse Farabee
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Slovak
Endicott · 2014-15
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.