IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robert Haak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-05-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 36 5 12 17 0.472 0.0533 0.0522 0.1606 0.1573
2019-20 New England Wolves EHL 42 7 15 22 0.524 0.0766 0.0766 0.2568 0.2568
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 25 3 9 12 0.480
2023-24 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 25 3 9 12 0.480
2022-23 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 12 0 4 4 0.333
2021-22 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 12 1 0 1 0.083
2020-21 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8587
Defenseman overall
#1759
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johan Granath
New England College · 2005-06
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Mismash
St. Scholastica · 2015-16
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Paige
Wisconsin-Superior · 2002-03
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.