← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johan Granath Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-04-29 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 AIK U20 SHL-J20 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.1395 0.1526 0.3603 0.3943
2003-04 AIK U20 SHL-J20 7 0 0 0 0.000
2004-05 Djurgårdens IF U20 SHL-J20 32 6 8 14 0.438 0.2441 0.2435 0.6305 0.6290
2005-06 AIK U20 SuperElit 26 4 2 6 0.231 0.0889 0.0840 0.3000 0.2834
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 New England College D3 SR 25 12 9 21 0.840
2008-09 New England College D3 SO 27 9 13 22 0.815
2007-08 New England College D3 FR 25 8 9 17 0.680
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2007-08 · New England College
+437.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29047
Forward overall
#1075
Forward born in 1986
#2561
in SHL-J20

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2017-18
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2011-12
0.882 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.