IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Gallary Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Hotchkiss School NE-Prep 20 2 1 3 0.150 0.0289 0.0289 0.0686 0.0686
2022-23 Hotchkiss School NE-Prep 21 2 6 8 0.381 0.0735 0.0735 0.1743 0.1743
2023-24 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 46 2 16 18 0.391 0.0849 0.0824 0.3029 0.2941
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamilton D3 NESCAC — 27 2 9 11 0.407
2024-25 Hamilton D3 NESCAC — 9 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16860
Defenseman overall
#3145
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Travis Quigley
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Gauthier
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Doc Gentzler
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.