IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Wracker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Northeast Generals NA3HL 47 21 22 43 0.915 0.1148 0.1148 0.2888 0.2888
2020-21 Northeast Generals NA3HL 40 12 21 33 0.825 0.1035 0.1035 0.2605 0.2605
2021-22 Northeast Generals NA3HL 18 8 9 17 0.944 0.1185 0.1118 0.2981 0.2813
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 — 28 4 4 8 0.286
2024-25 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 — 26 4 3 7 0.269
2023-24 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 — 26 2 6 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2023-24 · St. Michael's College
+221.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27337
Forward overall
#1410
Forward born in 2001
#863
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jameson Lundquist
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matteo Peca
Post · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Tenezaca
Concordia · 2021-22
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.