IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seth Wyatt-Manning Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 47 3 18 21 0.447 0.0561 0.0561 0.1411 0.1411
2020-21 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 36 3 20 23 0.639 0.0802 0.0802 0.2017 0.2017
2021-22 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 40 2 26 28 0.700 0.0878 0.0801 0.2210 0.2016
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 King's D3 MAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 King's D3 MAC — 13 0 2 2 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2022-23 · King's
+103.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11494
Defenseman overall
#2092
Defenseman born in 2001
#1800
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Daniel Kovar
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Lambright
Williams · 2021-22
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tobin Winslow
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.