IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dean Simeone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Portsmouth Abbey NE-Prep 24 6 2 8 0.333 0.0660 0.0660 0.1519 0.1519
2020-21 Trinity-Pawling NE-Prep 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.0660 0.0660 0.1519 0.1519
2021-22 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 18 3 4 7 0.389 0.0898 0.0908 0.1903 0.1925
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Assumption D2 NE10 SR 29 4 6 10 0.345
2024-25 Assumption D2 NE10 JR 28 4 1 5 0.179
2023-24 Assumption D2 NE10 SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Assumption D2 NE10 FR 13 0 2 2 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2022-23 · Assumption
+122.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42856
Forward overall
#2697
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Jerzak
Elmira · 2023-24
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Husted
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Rand
Suffolk · 2018-19
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.