← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Paredes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-11-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 31 1 1 2 0.065 0.0124 0.0124 0.0295 0.0295
2019-20 Berkshire School NE-Prep 30 5 7 12 0.400 0.0772 0.0772 0.1830 0.1830
2021-22 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 26 6 8 14 0.538 0.0788 0.0780 0.2640 0.2612
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 22 1 1 2 0.091
2024-25 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 15 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 24 2 0 2 0.083
2022-23 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 17 1 0 1 0.059
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2022-23 · Wentworth
-11.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41185
Forward overall
#2314
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2011-12
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.345 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.