← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Leone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-11-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 48 6 7 13 0.271 0.1073 0.1140 0.2843 0.3020
2010-11 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 54 11 13 24 0.444 0.1761 0.1781 0.4666 0.4720
2011-12 Kalamazoo Jr. K-Wings NAHL 59 4 24 28 0.475 0.1880 0.1809 0.4983 0.4794
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 29 11 16 27 0.931
2014-15 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 30 6 12 18 0.600
2013-14 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 28 1 13 14 0.500
2012-13 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 22 6 6 12 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2012-13 · Adrian
+221.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9161
Defenseman overall
#1171
Defenseman born in 1991
#3338
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2014-15
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.