| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Wichita Falls Wildcats | NAHL | 48 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 0.271 | 0.1073 | 0.1140 | 0.2843 | 0.3020 |
| 2010-11 | Wichita Falls Wildcats | NAHL | 54 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 0.444 | 0.1761 | 0.1781 | 0.4666 | 0.4720 |
| 2011-12 | Kalamazoo Jr. K-Wings | NAHL | 59 | 4 | 24 | 28 | 0.475 | 0.1880 | 0.1809 | 0.4983 | 0.4794 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | SR | 29 | 11 | 16 | 27 | 0.931 |
| 2014-15 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | JR | 30 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 0.600 |
| 2013-14 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | SO | 28 | 1 | 13 | 14 | 0.500 |
| 2012-13 | Adrian | D3 | NCHA | FR | 22 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.545 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.