IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steve Guo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-04 Country: China
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Tabor NE-Prep 28 0 1 1 0.036 0.0069 0.0069 0.0163 0.0163
2021-22 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 45 7 15 22 0.489 0.0715 0.0722 0.2397 0.2421
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 10 0 2 2 0.200
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 9 2 2 4 0.444
2023-24 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 9 0 1 1 0.111
2022-23 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+323.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45453
Forward overall
#2894
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Hansen
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Papayoanou
Southern Maine · 2015-16
0.192 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Guiney
Concordia (WI) · 2018-19
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.