← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Watson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kent School NE-Prep 24 7 4 11 0.458 0.0880 0.0880 0.2088 0.2088
2020-21 Kent School NE-Prep 5 3 2 5 1.000 0.1920 0.1920 0.4556 0.4556
2021-22 Kent School NE-Prep 26 13 10 23 0.885 0.1698 0.1698 0.4030 0.4030
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 6 1 0 1 0.167
2024-25 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 12 1 0 1 0.083
2023-24 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 13 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 11 0 1 1 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2022-23 · Connecticut College
-40.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
40%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28360
Forward overall
#1624
Forward born in 2003
#353
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Western New England · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2014-15
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.