← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Hoitt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-05-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 40 4 15 19 0.475 0.0536 0.0536 0.1616 0.1616
2020-21 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 30 0 11 11 0.367 0.0414 0.0414 0.1248 0.1248
2021-22 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 39 3 25 28 0.718 0.0810 0.0795 0.2442 0.2397
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SR 23 0 2 2 0.087
2024-25 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 JR 26 1 1 2 0.077
2023-24 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SO 28 1 10 11 0.393
2022-23 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 FR 12 0 1 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2022-23 · Saint Anselm
+11.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7851
Defenseman overall
#1823
Defenseman born in 2002
#2515
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2017-18
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2013-14
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2003-04
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.