IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abe Laggis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 22 8 11 19 0.864 0.0955 0.1038 0.2736 0.2972
2019-20 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 46 18 33 51 1.109 0.1226 0.1226 0.3512 0.3512
2020-21 Minnesota Moose NA3HL 41 4 9 13 0.317 0.0351 0.0351 0.1005 0.1005
2021-22 Minnesota Moose NA3HL 44 12 31 43 0.977 0.1081 0.1016 0.3096 0.2909
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Misericordia D3 MAC — 24 1 3 4 0.167
2024-25 Misericordia D3 MAC — 23 2 3 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2024-25 · Misericordia
+147.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30760
Forward overall
#1629
Forward born in 2001
#1147
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Oliver Arnberg
Nichols · 2016-17
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mack Ohnsted
Augsburg · 2011-12
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrison Sanipass
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.710 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.