IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zeth Stelmaszak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Toledo Cherokee USPHL-Premier 44 15 25 40 0.909 0.1189 0.1189 0.3085 0.3085
2020-21 Toledo Cherokee USPHL-Premier 42 11 34 45 1.071 0.1401 0.1401 0.3636 0.3636
2021-22 Toledo Cherokee USPHL-Premier 36 14 40 54 1.500 0.1962 0.1977 0.5091 0.5130
2022-23 Toledo Cherokee USPHL-Premier 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Trine D3 NCHA — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Trine D3 NCHA — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
25%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8998
Forward overall
#435
Forward born in 2002
#360
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonathan Grebosky
Concordia · 2012-13
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyler Moje
Bethel · 2006-07
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jestin Somero
SUNY Morrisville · 2017-18
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.