IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tony Andrews Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 39 11 8 19 0.487 0.0587 0.0587 0.1539 0.1539
2021-22 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 42 16 17 33 0.786 0.1686 0.1662 0.3848 0.3793
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Neumann D3 MAC SR 12 0 1 1 0.083
2024-25 Neumann D3 MAC JR 25 3 2 5 0.200
2023-24 Neumann D3 MAC SO 22 6 5 11 0.500
2022-23 Neumann D3 MAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32851
Forward overall
#1356
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will Robertson
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Fleck
Augsburg · 2003-04
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Degerness
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2001-02
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.