IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Ennis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New England Wolves EHL 43 1 3 4 0.093 0.0136 0.0136 0.0456 0.0456
2020-21 New England Wolves EHL 33 1 2 3 0.091 0.0133 0.0133 0.0446 0.0446
2021-22 New England Wolves EHL 45 3 7 10 0.222 0.0325 0.0308 0.1089 0.1032
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SR 25 0 4 4 0.160
2024-25 Framingham State D3 MASCAC JR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SO 7 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Framingham State D3 MASCAC FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25390
Defenseman overall
#3533
Defenseman born in 2001
#2914
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Gibson
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.448 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Novak
UMass Boston · 2007-08
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bobby Marshall
Lebanon Valley · 2007-08
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.