IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan McDevitt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHLP 20 7 10 17 0.850 0.0975 0.1031 0.1916 0.2026
2019-20 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 18 0 1 1 0.056 0.0128 0.0128 0.0272 0.0272
2021-22 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 45 4 14 18 0.400 0.0924 0.0913 0.1957 0.1934
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Post D2 NE10 SR 11 0 1 1 0.091
2024-25 Post D2 NE10 JR 14 2 0 2 0.143
2023-24 Post D2 NE10 SO 11 2 2 4 0.364
2022-23 Post D2 NE10 FR 11 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46456
Forward overall
#2719
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Anzai
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Shields
Lake Forest · 2018-19
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Frank Zuccaro
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.