IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan McDevitt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHLP 20 7 10 17 0.850 0.0553 0.0585 0.1914 0.2024
2019-20 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 18 0 1 1 0.056 0.0081 0.0081 0.0273 0.0273
2021-22 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 45 4 14 18 0.400 0.0585 0.0578 0.1961 0.1938
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Post D2 NE10 SR 11 0 1 1 0.091
2024-25 Post D2 NE10 JR 14 2 0 2 0.143
2023-24 Post D2 NE10 SO 11 2 2 4 0.364
2022-23 Post D2 NE10 FR 11 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46056
Forward overall
#2693
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Drew Shields
Lake Forest · 2018-19
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Anzai
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kendall Bolen-Porter
Finlandia · 2014-15
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.