← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Tchor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Oakville Blades OJHL 50 11 19 30 0.600 0.1471 0.1471 0.4107 0.4107
2020-21 Brockville Braves CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Brockville Braves CCHL 43 22 15 37 0.861 0.1866 0.1852 0.6661 0.6612
2022-23 Collingwood Blues OJHL 24 10 17 27 1.125 0.2757 0.2591 0.7701 0.7236
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamilton D3 NESCAC GR 26 18 16 34 1.308
2024-25 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 29 17 17 34 1.172
2023-24 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 26 13 21 34 1.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.31
2023-24 · Hamilton
+565.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11360
Forward overall
#551
Forward born in 2002
#267
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2004-05
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.