IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeremy Price Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-09-26 Country: Canada
2009 · Round 4, Pick #113  ·  Vancouver Canucks Vancouver Canucks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 King Rebellion OJHL 37 1 6 7 0.189 0.0464 0.0521 0.1303 0.1463
2007-08 King Rebellion OJHL 44 10 22 32 0.727 0.1783 0.1922 0.5007 0.5396
2008-09 Nepean Raiders CCHL 55 12 29 41 0.746 0.1617 0.1658 0.5768 0.5915
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 36 6 14 20 0.556
2011-12 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 36 2 21 23 0.639
2010-11 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 42 5 14 19 0.452
2009-10 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 35 6 8 14 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2009-10 · Colgate
+140.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7440
Defenseman overall
#1092
Defenseman born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Ryan
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard McCartney
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Michalchuk
Middlebury · 2000-01
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.