IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Sadovski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-07-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 31 5 6 11 0.355 0.0327 0.0356 0.0812 0.0883
2018-19 — NCDC 35 4 7 11 0.314 0.1281 0.1273 0.2526 0.2511
2019-20 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 49 10 30 40 0.816 0.3328 0.3328 0.6561 0.6561
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 UMass Boston D3 NEHC GR 23 3 9 12 0.522
2023-24 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SR 16 2 4 6 0.375
2022-23 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 2 0 1 1 0.500
2021-22 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3193
Defenseman overall
#749
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Shaw
Marian · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Chakeen
UMass Boston · 2008-09
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn O'Malley
Aurora · 2016-17
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.