IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Sclisizzi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 52 12 20 32 0.615 0.1508 0.1471 0.4212 0.4110
2022-23 Collingwood Blues OJHL 47 7 9 16 0.340 0.0834 0.0771 0.2330 0.2155
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Norwich D3 LittleEast GR 29 3 6 9 0.310
2024-25 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 28 3 5 8 0.286
2023-24 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 24 4 8 12 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2023-24 · Norwich
+455.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39164
Forward overall
#2434
Forward born in 2002
#2497
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Brooks
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2011-12
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Fasano
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael McIntosh
Amherst · 2003-04
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.