IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Pennell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-06-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 37 2 5 7 0.189 0.0485 0.0529 0.1402 0.1529
2009-10 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 49 6 7 13 0.265 0.0511 0.0531 0.1672 0.1736
2010-11 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 49 6 7 13 0.265 0.0511 0.0506 0.1672 0.1655
2011-12 — MJHL 51 11 13 24 0.471 0.0906 0.0851 0.2966 0.2786
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Concordia D3 MIAC — 13 2 4 6 0.462
2012-13 Concordia (WI) D3 — FR 13 2 4 6 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2012-13 · Concordia
+656.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#47128
Forward overall
#1695
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Faiz Khan
UMass Boston · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Johansson
Endicott · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jerad Tafoya
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.