← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gunnar Sibley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Monticello USHS-MN 30 10 18 28 0.933 0.2512 0.2512 0.2267 0.2267
2020-21 Monticello USHS-MN 20 10 9 19 0.950 0.2557 0.2557 0.2308 0.2308
2021-22 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 35 1 7 8 0.229 0.0526 0.0526 0.0724 0.0724
2022-23 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 47 15 14 29 0.617 0.1419 0.1354 0.1955 0.1866
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England College D3 LittleEast GR 25 9 11 20 0.800
2024-25 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 27 10 9 19 0.704
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 25 6 4 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2023-24 · New England College
+356.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38683
Forward overall
#2396
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nazareth · 2014-15
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2009-10
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.