← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gunnar Sibley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Monticello USHS-MN 30 10 18 28 0.933 0.1182 0.1182 0.2267 0.2267
2020-21 Monticello USHS-MN 20 10 9 19 0.950 0.1203 0.1203 0.2308 0.2308
2021-22 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 35 1 7 8 0.229 0.0287 0.0287 0.0722 0.0722
2022-23 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 47 15 14 29 0.617 0.0774 0.0739 0.1948 0.1859
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England College D3 LittleEast GR 25 9 11 20 0.800
2024-25 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 27 10 9 19 0.704
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 25 6 4 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2023-24 · New England College
+736.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38858
Forward overall
#2403
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2022-23
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2014-15
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.