← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Fernet Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Taft NE-Prep 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0386 0.0386 0.0915 0.0915
2021-22 Taft NE-Prep 22 2 8 10 0.455 0.0877 0.0877 0.2080 0.2080
2022-23 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 34 12 9 21 0.618 0.0904 0.0911 0.3028 0.3053
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 25 1 3 4 0.160
2024-25 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 25 2 4 6 0.240
2023-24 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 23 2 8 10 0.435
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2023-24 · Manhattanville
+413.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
20%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7921
Defenseman overall
#1844
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2011-12
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2012-13
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.