IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tanner Bennett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Cincinnati Swords NA3HL 19 8 5 13 0.684 0.0859 0.0877 0.2160 0.2206
2014-15 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights EHL 44 11 23 34 0.773 0.1785 0.1768 0.3781 0.3746
2015-16 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 60 15 20 35 0.583 0.2143 0.2006 0.6157 0.5763
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Trine D3 NCHA — 22 3 5 8 0.364
2016-17 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen — 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#24237
Forward overall
#925
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby Jaquet
Utica · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vick Schlueter
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Remick
Hobart · 2023-24
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.