IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitch Hughes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Tri-City Storm USHL 39 2 3 5 0.128 0.0816 0.0852 0.3842 0.4010
2010-11 — USHL 56 3 6 9 0.161 0.1023 0.1016 0.4816 0.4784
2011-12 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 31 1 8 9 0.290 0.1849 0.1750 0.8699 0.8235
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 24 4 10 14 0.583
2014-15 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 25 10 14 24 0.960
2013-14 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 21 6 6 12 0.571
2012-13 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 25 15 11 26 1.040
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2012-13 · Bethel
+734.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30438
Forward overall
#1286
Forward born in 1992
#3586
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Sami Salminen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Poulsen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Miller
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Doull
Lake Forest · 2001-02
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Orrin Hergott
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.839 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.