← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Sitnikov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-08 Country: Russia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Hampshire Avalanche EHLP 8 2 1 3 0.375 0.0430 0.0430 0.0845 0.0845
2020-21 New Hampshire Avalanche EHLP 32 9 8 17 0.531 0.0609 0.0609 0.1197 0.1197
2021-22 New Hampshire Avalanche EHLP 40 15 16 31 0.775 0.0889 0.0856 0.1747 0.1683
2022-23 East Coast Wizards EHL 45 10 6 16 0.356 0.0821 0.0797 0.1740 0.1689
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Rivier D3 MASCAC GR 22 0 3 3 0.136
2024-25 Rivier D3 MASCAC SR 19 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Rivier D3 MASCAC JR 20 5 4 9 0.450
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2023-24 · Rivier
+541.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41498
Forward overall
#2585
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Framingham State · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2022-23
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.