← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Drysdale Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Elite 43 13 28 41 0.954 0.0880 0.0969 0.2184 0.2406
2019-20 Boston Jr. Rangers EHLP 40 18 27 45 1.125 0.1290 0.1290 0.2536 0.2536
2020-21 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Premier 15 13 14 27 1.800 0.2354 0.2354 0.6109 0.6109
2021-22 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Premier 40 12 21 33 0.825 0.1079 0.1078 0.2800 0.2796
2022-23 King Rebellion OJHL 52 13 12 25 0.481 0.1178 0.1099 0.3310 0.3089
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canton D3 SUNYAC JR 16 4 0 4 0.250
2024-25 Canton D3 SUNYAC SO 15 3 3 6 0.400
2023-24 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 18 3 5 8 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2023-24 · Canton
+375.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17341
Forward overall
#913
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.