IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Little Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Seacoast Spartans EHL 38 8 9 17 0.447 0.0655 0.0655 0.2194 0.2194
2021-22 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 39 6 7 13 0.333 0.0488 0.0501 0.1634 0.1676
2022-23 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 42 7 10 17 0.405 0.0592 0.0576 0.1985 0.1933
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Dartmouth D3 — JR 23 1 2 3 0.130
2024-25 UMass Dartmouth D3 — SO 18 0 2 2 0.111
2023-24 UMass Dartmouth D3 — FR 13 0 4 4 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2023-24 · UMass Dartmouth
+558.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38913
Forward overall
#2414
Forward born in 2002
#1552
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stefan Koproske
Western New England · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Cobb
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jim Ceglarek
Becker · 2005-06
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.