← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Martino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 36 8 16 24 0.667 0.0872 0.0872 0.2263 0.2263
2020-21 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 39 17 29 46 1.179 0.1543 0.1543 0.4003 0.4003
2021-22 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 43 39 21 60 1.395 0.1825 0.1835 0.4736 0.4762
2022-23 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 39 12 12 24 0.615 0.2509 0.2437 0.4947 0.4804
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Chatham D3 UCHC GR 17 5 4 9 0.529
2024-25 Chatham D3 UCHC SR 3 1 0 1 0.333
2023-24 Chatham D3 UCHC JR 13 3 3 6 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2023-24 · Chatham
+145.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8976
Forward overall
#433
Forward born in 2002
#358
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.