IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Holl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Taft NE-Prep 3 0 3 3 1.000 0.1929 0.1929 0.4576 0.4576
2021-22 Taft NE-Prep 20 4 8 12 0.600 0.1157 0.1157 0.2746 0.2746
2022-23 Taft NE-Prep 28 18 32 50 1.786 0.3445 0.3445 0.8171 0.8171
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SR 17 3 8 11 0.647
2024-25 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 15 2 1 3 0.200
2023-24 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 17 2 3 5 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2023-24 · Bowdoin
+35.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
35%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10641
Forward overall
#473
Forward born in 2003
#40
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Billings
Salve Regina · 2013-14
1.381 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Payne
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Prescott
Nichols · 2009-10
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.