← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Dee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-01-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 NMH NE-Prep 30 1 1 2 0.067 0.0129 0.0129 0.0305 0.0305
2019-20 NMH NE-Prep 28 3 6 9 0.321 0.0620 0.0620 0.1471 0.1471
2020-21 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 25 2 8 10 0.400 0.0924 0.0924 0.3234 0.3234
2021-22 Northern Cyclones NCDC 45 0 6 6 0.133 0.0308 0.0300 0.1078 0.1050
2022-23 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 14 1 2 3 0.214 0.0495 0.0461 0.1733 0.1615
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lawrence D3 NCHA GR 17 0 2 2 0.118
2024-25 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 19 1 2 3 0.158
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 23 2 2 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2023-24 · Lawrence
+365.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13011
Defenseman overall
#2551
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2013-14
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.