IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Stevens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Lake Tahoe Lakers USPHL-Premier 37 33 31 64 1.730 0.2262 0.2205 0.5871 0.5722
2022-23 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 50 9 8 17 0.340 0.1386 0.1303 0.2733 0.2570
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 11 1 1 2 0.182
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 8 2 0 2 0.250
2023-24 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 18 3 0 3 0.167
2019-20 Yale D1 ECAC SR 31 7 5 12 0.387
2018-19 Yale D1 ECAC JR 23 4 3 7 0.304
2017-18 Yale D1 ECAC SO 30 6 5 11 0.367

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2313
Defenseman overall
#565
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eddie Shepler
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew McCormack
Manhattanville · 2024-25
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Charlie Robinson
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.