IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Stevens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Lake Tahoe Lakers USPHL-Premier 37 33 31 64 1.730 0.2328 0.2269 0.5888 0.5739
2022-23 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 50 9 8 17 0.340 0.0958 0.0901 0.2753 0.2589
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 11 1 1 2 0.182
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 8 2 0 2 0.250
2023-24 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 18 3 0 3 0.167
2019-20 Yale D1 ECAC SR 31 7 5 12 0.387
2018-19 Yale D1 ECAC JR 23 4 3 7 0.304
2017-18 Yale D1 ECAC SO 30 6 5 11 0.367
2016-17 Yale D1 ECAC FR 17 2 3 5 0.294

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6965
Defenseman overall
#1158
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arturas Laukaitis
Wisconsin-Stout · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Altmann
Williams · 2017-18
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Dvorak
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.