IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eddie Shepler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 19 2 1 3 0.158 0.0626 0.0626 0.1658 0.1658
2021-22 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 55 13 8 21 0.382 0.1513 0.1564 0.4009 0.4145
2022-23 — NAHL 56 10 9 19 0.339 0.1344 0.1323 0.3562 0.3508
2023-24 — NAHL 61 15 13 28 0.459 0.1819 0.1704 0.4819 0.4515
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 19 7 8 15 0.789
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 25 8 6 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2024-25 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+321.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34929
Forward overall
#2133
Forward born in 2003
#3498
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Timmy Nicksic
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.581 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Henry Cleghorn
SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Stansik
Adrian · 2006-07
1.172 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.