IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brayden Naumann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 33 18 9 27 0.818 0.0755 0.0755 0.1874 0.1874
2021-22 Dexter NE-Prep 25 2 3 5 0.200 0.0396 0.0396 0.0911 0.0911
2022-23 Dexter NE-Prep 31 2 2 4 0.129 0.0256 0.0256 0.0588 0.0588
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 — 30 8 9 17 0.567
2024-25 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 — 21 4 1 5 0.238
2023-24 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 — 19 2 1 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2023-24 · St. Michael's College
+491.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
70%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#53904
Forward overall
#3676
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bryan Basilico
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Chiocca
Trinity · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Munro
St. Olaf · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wyatt Trumbley
Westfield State · 2012-13
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.