IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Demio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-05-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Brewster NE-Prep 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0386 0.0386 0.0915 0.0915
2021-22 New England Wolves EHL 42 2 3 5 0.119 0.0174 0.0176 0.0583 0.0591
2022-23 New England Wolves EHL 37 6 15 21 0.568 0.0830 0.0798 0.2783 0.2676
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Assumption D2 NE10 GR 33 2 9 11 0.333
2024-25 Assumption D2 NE10 SR 30 0 3 3 0.100
2023-24 Assumption D2 NE10 JR 13 0 3 3 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2023-24 · Assumption
+345.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12320
Defenseman overall
#2469
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Kovacs
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Jacobson
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tony DeVito
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.