← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaiah McKinney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Premier 35 0 4 4 0.114 0.0377 0.0377 0.0389 0.0389
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NA3HL 16 2 0 2 0.125 0.0288 0.0288 0.0396 0.0396
2021-22 New Jersey Jr. Titans NA3HL 46 6 9 15 0.326 0.0750 0.0725 0.1033 0.0999
2022-23 EHL 44 3 6 9 0.204 0.0720 0.0686 0.1003 0.0955
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC GR 25 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SR 26 1 3 4 0.154
2023-24 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC JR 20 0 3 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2023-24 · Fitchburg State
+126.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23476
Defenseman overall
#3608
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2024-25
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2015-16
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2005-06
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.