IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake McIntyre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Mid Cities Jr. Stars NA3HL 7 6 4 10 1.429 0.3286 0.3336 0.4526 0.4594
2014-15 Mid Cities Jr. Stars NA3HL 44 10 16 26 0.591 0.1359 0.1313 0.1872 0.1809
2015-16 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 31 9 18 27 0.871 0.1530 0.1418 0.1995 0.1849
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Tufts D1 — SR 20 1 1 2 0.100
2019-20 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 20 1 1 2 0.100
2018-19 Tufts D1 — JR 15 0 1 1 0.067
2018-19 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 15 0 1 1 0.067
2017-18 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 20 2 2 4 0.200
2016-17 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 18 2 0 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2016-17 · Tufts
-5.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37366
Forward overall
#1548
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Fogu
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Court
UMass Dartmouth · 2014-15
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Thompson
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2023-24
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.