← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Centennial USHS-MN 27 9 14 23 0.852 0.2293 0.2293 0.2069 0.2069
2020-21 Centennial USHS-MN 21 4 19 23 1.095 0.2948 0.2948 0.2660 0.2660
2021-22 El Paso Rhinos NA3HL 44 22 33 55 1.250 0.2875 0.2921
2022-23 Neepawa Titans MJHL 31 9 5 14 0.452 0.1228 0.1191 0.2846 0.2760
2023-24 Neepawa Titans MJHL 58 19 24 43 0.741 0.2016 0.1849 0.4672 0.4286
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 23 1 1 2 0.087
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 8 1 1 2 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+84.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28780
Forward overall
#1654
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2017-18
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2017-18
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.