← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Centennial USHS-MN 27 9 14 23 0.852 0.1079 0.1079 0.2068 0.2068
2020-21 Centennial USHS-MN 21 4 19 23 1.095 0.1387 0.1387 0.2659 0.2659
2021-22 El Paso Rhinos NA3HL 44 22 33 55 1.250 0.1593 0.1619 — —
2022-23 Neepawa Titans MJHL 31 9 5 14 0.452 0.0869 0.0843 0.2854 0.2768
2023-24 Neepawa Titans MJHL 58 19 24 43 0.741 0.1427 0.1309 0.4685 0.4298
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 23 1 1 2 0.087
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 8 1 1 2 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+160.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29225
Forward overall
#1687
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2017-18
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2017-18
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.