← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Duckson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 31 11 5 16 0.516 0.1389 0.1389 0.1254 0.1254
2020-21 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 21 4 9 13 0.619 0.1666 0.1666 0.1504 0.1504
2021-22 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0383 0.0384 0.0528 0.0529
2022-23 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 41 10 14 24 0.585 0.1346 0.1289 0.1855 0.1776
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England College D3 LittleEast GR 21 7 2 9 0.429
2024-25 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 26 1 1 2 0.077
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 11 0 2 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2023-24 · New England College
+129.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37408
Forward overall
#2303
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia (WI) · 2012-13
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2017-18
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2022-23
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.