← New Search ↗ Social Card

Holden Beckett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Gillette Wild NA3HL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Boston Advantage USPHL-Premier 29 4 2 6 0.207 0.0271 0.0287 0.0702 0.0744
2022-23 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier 39 9 11 20 0.513 0.0671 0.0678 0.1740 0.1758
2023-24 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 38 11 7 18 0.474 0.0620 0.0597 0.1608 0.1547
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Post D2 NE10 13 1 2 3 0.231
2024-25 Post D2 NE10 16 2 4 6 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2024-25 · Post
+595.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38650
Forward overall
#2411
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.