IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Raymond Perrault Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-11-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.0735 0.0788 0.2111 0.2262
2023-24 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 49 3 2 5 0.102 0.0375 0.0384 0.1077 0.1102
2024-25 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 53 6 10 16 0.302 0.1109 0.1077 0.3187 0.3095
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 2 0 1 1 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · SUNY Oswego
+562.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19299
Defenseman overall
#3419
Defenseman born in 2004
#5688
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Owen Van Tassel
Hamline · 2023-24
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Hayward
SUNY Brockport · 2008-09
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Evans
Norwich · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.