IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cal Levis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Rogers USHS-MN 26 12 19 31 1.192 0.1469 0.1469 0.2896 0.2896
2021-22 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 41 18 8 26 0.634 0.0701 0.0683 0.2009 0.1957
2022-23 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 44 22 14 36 0.818 0.0905 0.0840 0.2592 0.2407
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamline D3 MIAC — 25 0 1 1 0.040
2024-25 Hamline D3 MIAC — 21 2 4 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2024-25 · Hamline
+329.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27341
Forward overall
#1585
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Chapman
Finlandia · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Malcarney
Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Haverstrom
UMass Boston · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.