IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wade Volo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New England Wolves EHL 6 0 4 4 0.667 0.0975 0.0975 0.3269 0.3269
2021-22 Westminster NE-Prep 25 4 5 9 0.360 0.0694 0.0694 0.1647 0.1647
2022-23 Westminster NE-Prep 26 9 17 26 1.000 0.1929 0.1929 0.4576 0.4576
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 10 1 3 4 0.400
2024-25 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 11 2 0 2 0.182
2023-24 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 5 0 1 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2023-24 · Connecticut College
+62.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26934
Forward overall
#1547
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Caouette
New England College · 2001-02
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Shugart
Williams · 2012-13
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Lee
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.