IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stirling Nash Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Philadelphia Revolution EHLP 24 5 16 21 0.875 0.1004 0.1004 0.1972 0.1972
2020-21 Philadelphia Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 38 13 16 29 0.763 0.0998 0.0998 0.2590 0.2590
2021-22 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 42 3 17 20 0.476 0.0623 0.0602 0.1616 0.1560
2022-23 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 43 10 24 34 0.791 0.1034 0.0948 0.2684 0.2460
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SO 25 3 7 10 0.400
2023-24 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC — 14 0 1 1 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2023-24 · Anna Maria
3.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24661
Forward overall
#1374
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Conner Elliott
Hobart · 2023-24
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Ranieri
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Lubczuk
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.