← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stirling Nash Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Philadelphia Revolution EHLP 24 5 16 21 0.875 0.0569 0.0569 0.1971 0.1971
2020-21 Philadelphia Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 38 13 16 29 0.763 0.0861 0.0861 0.2596 0.2596
2021-22 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 42 3 17 20 0.476 0.0537 0.0519 0.1620 0.1564
2022-23 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 43 10 24 34 0.791 0.0892 0.0817 0.2690 0.2465
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Worcester State D3 MASCAC 25 3 7 10 0.400
2023-24 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC 14 0 1 1 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2023-24 · Anna Maria
+19.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24365
Forward overall
#1365
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Webster · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2016-17
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.